The Qualification Round this year had five problems, which took me a while to notice—I had to scroll horizontally to see the fifth problem. I attempted all five, but only managed to write working solutions for three of them.
Problem 1: Vestigium
That was an easy one, but for some reason I didn't manage to code it correctly in Common Lisp. Even though my code looked totally straightforward, it only produced an RE (Runtime Error) when run against the data set. Finally I rewrote the solution in C++, and that worked on first try.
Problem 2: Nesting Depth
The task was to generate appropriate numbers of correctly nested parentheses. Obviously this type of problem is familiar to Lispers, and this time my straightforward code actually worked. My sloppiness resulted in an invalid attempt, as I initially left out the (solve) call at the end of the script.
Problem 3: Parenting Partnering Returns
It occurred to me relatively early that the problem maps to the problem of partitioning (two-coloring) the interval graph. However, all my attempts of coding this simple graph traversal algorithm in Common Lisp ended in REs (Runtime Exceptions) again. Very frustrating!
Problem 4: ESAb ATAd
This was my favorite problem, and I came up with a simple and near-optimal solution pretty quickly. It would have worked the first time, had I not (again) forgotten to add the correct (solve) call after the development phase.
Problem 5: Indicium
That one was definitely too hard for me! After the deadline, I read the analysis and took it up again. I managed to code a super-efficient method to generate latin squares with arbitrary possible traces at will, based on "circulating" matrices. The only cases that I cannot solve in this way are odd-sized with traces of is n+2 or n2-2.
Finally I advanced with 49 points (from 100, with 30 required), and ranked #6318 of about 44000 participants. My Lisp development and graph algorithm skills have become a bit rusty, and I'm not very optimistic about being able to survive Online Round 1.
Post a Comment